Hopp til innholdet

Hopp til hovedmeny

Hopp til Søk

Hopp til sidemeny

NUPI
Forsiden Nyheter Medarbeidere Arrangementer Publikasjoner Kontakt Sidekart
 
A A A Bokmål Nynorsk English
 

Stein Sundstøl Eriksen

 
 
Hvor hender det? Presse Næringsliv Om NUPI Avdelinger Forskningsprogram Ledige stillinger Intranett
nupi.no Virksomheten Avdeling for utviklingsstudier Stein Sundstøl Eriksen

Stein Sundstøl Eriksen [Avdelingsleder ]

Stein Sundstøl Eriksen
E-post:
sseSPAMFILTER@nupi.no
Direkte:
Mobil:
950 10 232
Postadresse:
Pb 8159 Dep, 0033 Oslo
Besøksadresse:
C.J. Hambros plass 2 D
Personlig informasjon
Info
 

Publikasjoner

  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl, Sverre Lodgaard, Arne Melchior, Karl Rich, Elana Wilson Rowe, Ole Jacob Sending (2012). BRICS, Energy and the New World Order . Oslo, NUPI. 39 sider. I denne studien undersøker NUPI-forskere ulike aspekter ved temaet BRIKS og global energi.
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl, Øyvind Eggen, Aparajita Biswas, Ajay Dubey, Mzukuzi Qobo (2012). India in Africa. Oslo, NUPI. 67 sider. NUPI-rapport. Rapporten gir en oversikt over indisk engasjement i Afrika, og diskuterer hvilke konsekvenser det har for afrikanske land og for Norge.
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2012). Regimes, Constituencies and the Politics of State Formation: Zimbabwe and Botswana Compared,

    in International Political Science Review June 2012; 33 (3)

    .Sage.I denne artikkelen analyserer Stein Sundstøl Eriksen statsdannelsen i Botswana og Rhodesia/Zimbabwe. Han forklarer hvorfor Botswana ble en sterk stat, mens statsmakten i Rhodesia/Zimbabwe har blitt svekket. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2011). The Possibility of State Formation: the Experience of Botswana in a Theoretical Perspective,

    in European Journal of Development Research, no 1, 2011

    .Pallgrave MacMillan.s. 444-458.This article examines the process of state formation in Botswana in the light of the major theoretical literature on the issue. It is argued that neither the geopolitical nor the fiscal theories of state formation can explain why the state in Botswana became so strong and effective. An alternative framework is outlined, in which state formation is seen as shaped by the relationship between states, regimes and social groups. The formation of a strong state in Botswana became possible because it was compatible with the interests of the ruling regime (politically as well as economically), and because the ruling regime had sufficient power to carry out a project of state strengthening. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2011). 'State failure’ in theory and practice: the idea of the state and the contradictions of state formation ,

    i Review of International Studies, vol. 37, issue 1

    .British International Studies Association (BISA).s. 229-247.This article provides a critique of the discourse of ‘failed states’, and outlines an alternative approach. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2011). Bonfire of Illusions. The Twin Crises of the Liberal World. book review in Agora nr. 1, 25. mai
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl, Eli Moen (2010). Political economy analysis with a legitimacy twist: What is it and why does it matter?. Oslo, Norad. 28 sider. Rapporten søker å forklare hvordan politisk-økonomisk analyse kan bli enda nyttigere med spesiell vekt på statsbygging og statens legitimitet i befolkningen.
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2010). State Formation and the Politics of Regime Survival: Zimbabwe in theoretical perspective,

    in Journal of Historical Sociology, no 2, 2010

    .Wiley.s. 316-340.This article analyses state formation in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe. The main question posed is this: Why has state power eroded so dramatically? To answer this question, the development of the state is analysed in the light of general theories of state formation. In spite of a situation which according to prevailing theories was conducive for the formation of a strong state, Zimbabwe entered a downward spiral, where state power gradually eroded. To explain this, it is necessary to move beyond these theories, and analyse the changing nature of the ruling regime's constituencies. While security threats and sources of revenue are important, their impact on processes of state formation is mediated by the inter-relationship between ruling regimes and their constituencies, which is shaped by society's class structure. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl, Ole Jacob Sending, Séverine Bellina, Dominique Darbon (2010). L’ Etat en Quete de Legitimite´. , Institut de recherche et débat sur la gouvernance. 111 sider.
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2010). The Theory of Failure and the Failure of Theory: 'State Failure', the Idea of the State and the Practice of State Building,

    in Harpviken, Kristian Berg [ed.], Troubled Regions and Failing States: The Clustering and Contagion of Armed Conflict, Comparative Social Research, Volume 27

    .Bingley,Emerald .s. 27-50.This article provides a critique of the discourse of 'failed states' and outlines an alternative approach to studying state formation. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2009). The Liberal Peace Is Neither: Peacebuilding, State building and the Reproduction of Conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo,

    in International Peacekeeping, Vol. 16, No. 5, November 2009

    .Taylor & Francis.s. 652-666.This article discusses the attempts at state-building by international actors in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2009). Liberalisme, sekularisme og staten. Glimt fra en indisk debatt,

    i Agora, vol. 27, nr. 1

    .s. 7-35.Glimt fra den indiske debatten omkring pluralisme og multikulturalisme. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2007). Nasjonale interesser i utviklingspolitikken ,

    i Internasjonal Politikk, vol. 65, nr. 4

    .Oslo,Norsk Utenrikspolitisk Institutt.s. 113-122.Artikkelen er et innspill i debatten, initiert av UD gjennom "Refleks"-prosjektet, om norsk utenrikspolitikk og norske interesser med spesielt fokus på norsk utviklingspolitikk. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2006). Bourdieu, nyliberalismen og globaliseringen,

    Agora, vol. 24, nr. 1-2

    .s. 298-317. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl, Kristen Nordhaug (2006). Politics of survival in the making of weak and strong states,

     Forum for Development Studies , nr. 2,

    .Oslo,NUPI.s. 237-265.. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2005). The Congo war and the prospects of state formation: Rwanda and Uganda compared. NUPI-notat: 675. 28 sider. Notatet analyserer hvilken effekt krigen i Kongo har hatt på statens makt i Rwanda og Uganda.
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2004). Krig og statssammenbrudd i Kongo,

    i Internasjonal politikk, vol. 62, nr. 4

    .Oslo, NUPI.s. 539-558.Artikkelen redegjør for Mobutu-regimets utvikling og søker å forklare regimets sammenbrudd. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2004). Den afrikanske staten: idé og virkelighet,

    i Internasjonal politikk, vol. 62, nr. 4

    .Oslo, NUPI.s. 499-515. [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2001). What Does Democracy Have to Do with It? van de Walle on Democracy and Economic Growth in Africa,

    Forum for Development Studies, vol. 28, nr. 1

    .Oslo,Norsk Utenrikspolitisk Institutt (NUPI).s. 59-68. [Fulltekst] [url]
  • Eriksen, Stein Sundstøl (2001). The State We're In: Recent Contributions to the Debate on State-Society Relations in Africa ,

    Forum for Development Studies, vol. 28, nr. 2

    .Oslo,Norsk Utenrikspolitisk Institutt (NUPI).s. 289-308. [Fulltekst] [url]