Hopp til innholdet

Hopp til hovedmeny

Hopp til Søk

Hopp til sidemeny

NUPI
 
 

Cultural Dialogue in International Security

 
 

[2012]Cultural Dialogue in International Security

The project looks at the conditions for and role of dialogue by focusing on how a select number of states have defined and responded to a series of crises. Studying the behaviour of states during times of crisis offers a good vantage point from which to gauge states’ interests and behaviour and by implication the conditions for, and role of, dialogue.
Deltakere

Pernille Rieker
Jakub M. Godzimirski

Sverre Lodgaard


The project looks at the conditions for and role of dialogue by focusing on how a select number of states have defined and responded to a series of crises . Studying the behaviour of states during times of crisis offers a good vantage point from which to gauge states’ interests and behaviour and by implication the conditions for, and role of, dialogue.

First, in times of crises, there is uncertainty as to what constitutes an appropriate or effective course of action to advance given interests. Indeed, what those interests are can be hard to pin down. Second, diplomacy is at heart about keeping on talking in order to communicate interests and to keep the door open for political solutions (i.e. dialogue). The character of diplomatic conversations during times of crises offers a good measure of their role in facilitating shared understandings and possibly also coordinated action. Finally, the resilience of dialogue is measured best in times of crises. Dialogue is time consuming and necessitates compromise to lead to cooperative solutions. In times of crises, there is often a shortage of both time and the willingness to compromise.

We define a crisis as a set of interlinked events where i) there is uncertainty on the part of actors about how best to advance their interests, ii) the actors are unsure about the facts of the situation and about other actors’ strategies, and iii) the stakes are high in terms of the long-term effects of decisions made.

The project features four case studies:  

  • Intervention in Libya. (Responsible: Pernille Rieker)
  • Russo-Georgian War (Responsible: Jakub Godzimirski)
  • Darfur and the ICC indictment of Sudanese President al-Bashir (Responsible: Andreas Stensland)
  • Iran’s nuclear weapons program. (Responsible: Sverre Lodgaard)

This NUPI project is part of a larger Chatham House portfolio of projects, seminars and publications.



Finansiering

The project is funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.


Publikasjoner

Publisert: 03.02.2012

Prosjektleder

Ole Jacob Sending

[Forskningssjef]
Ole Jacob Sending

Søk Prosjekt

Nyhetstjenester