Researcher
Stein Sundstøl Eriksen
Contactinfo and files
Summary
Expertise
Education
2000 Dr.Polit, Political Science, University of Oslo: Close links and blurred boundaries
1992 Cand.Polit, Political Science, University of Oslo
Work Experience
2000- Research fellow/head of departement, NUPI, Oslo
1994-2000 Researcher, NIBR, Oslo
1992-1994 Junior Professional Officer, United Nations, New Delhi
Aktivitet
Filter
Clear all filtersRegimes, Constituencies and the Politics of State Formation: Zimbabwe and Botswana Compared
BRICS, Energy and the New World Order
While the BRICS share some characteristics, they differ in several respects. How far can cooperation between them go? Is their cooperation mainly symbolic, or can extensive coordination be achieved? The BRICS are large countries, but will they act individually or jointly? In this present report, the authors examine selected issues in order to find out whether the BRICS have the capacity to develop common policies and cooperation.
"Enhet og framskritt: kapitalisme, nyliberalisme og demokrati i India"
The Possibility of State Formation: the Experience of Botswana in a Theoretical Perspective
'State failure' in theory and practice: the idea of the state and the contradictions of state formation
State Formation and the Politics of Regime Survival: Zimbabwe in Theoretical Perspective
The theory of failure and the failure of theory: ‘state failure’, the idea of the state and the practice of state building
The Congo war and the prospects of state formation : Rwanda and Uganda compared
This paper analyses the effect of the Congo war on state power in Rwanda and Uganda. Drawing on theories of European state formation, it asks whether the Congo war has led to a strengthening of the state in the two countries. It is argued that this has not been the case. Neither the Rwandan nor the Ugandan state has been strengthened as a result of the war. I argue that this must be explained by changes in the state system, which have altered the links between war and state formation. The «war makes states» connection presupposes a positive relationship between regime maintenance and state formation. In contemporary Africa, there is no link. On the one hand, state survival is guaranteed anyway, no matter how weak the state is. On the other hand, regime survival does not depend on mobilisation of resources through taxation, since resources are available from elsewhere (aid, crime, plunder, globalisation, warlord politics).