Skip to content
NUPI skole

Limited effect of halting gas export

Russia recently stopped the export of natural gas to Ukraine. But energy as a foreign policy tool has limited effects, conclude the authors behind the most cited article ever in the Journal of Eurasian Studies.
Bildet viser et Gazprom-anlegg ved elven Moskva.

POWER: A Gazprom facility by the Moscow River.

Greg Westfall/Creative Commons/CC BY 2.0

POWER: A Gazprom facility by the Moscow River.

Greg Westfall/Creative Commons/CC BY 2.0

On June 16 the news came out that the Russian energy company Gazprom has halted natural gas exports to Ukraine. In the past, the company has sold its gas cheaply to Ukraine in a trade-off for political influence and keeping military bases in Crimea.

Price conflict

After the overthrow of the Moscow’s ally Viktor Yanukovich, former president of Ukraine, Gazprom started demanding the highest price in Europe from Ukraine. The Ukrainians still insist on a continued discount, and this conflict has now resulted in a halt in natural gas export from Russia to Ukraine, while the gas transport from Russia via Ukraine to the EU continues as before.

Carrot and stick

Russia’s use of energy as a tool in foreign policy is the topic for an article in the Journal of Eurasian Studies by Robert Orttung from George Washington University and NUPI researcher Indra Overland. In the article the authors provide an overview of Russia’s use of energy as a foreign policy tool in energy conflicts with 20 different countries from 2000 to 2010.

“The Russians use energy both as a carrot and a stick. But energy as a foreign policy tool has limited effects”, the authors conclude.

The article is the most cited article ever published in the Journal of Eurasian Studies. It can be downloaded here.

Themes

  • Trade
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • Energy
  • The EU