Scientific article
Published:
Messaging Soleimani's killing: the communication vulnerabilities of authoritarian states
Written by
Kjetil Selvik
Research Professor and Head of the Research group on peace, conflict and development
Banafsheh Ranji
Tidligere ansatt
Ed.
Summary:
The capacity of authoritarian states to manipulate narratives and undermine the authority of western democracies is increasingly emphasized in International Relations research. Far less scrutiny has been paid to the ways in which the media environment creates communication vulnerabilities for these same repressive states. We address this research gap through a case-study of Persian-language commentary on the targeted assassination of Qasem Soleimani—a crescendo in the conflict between Iran and the United States. We examine how commentators on the two popular satellite channels interpreted Soleimani's killing and subsequent developments, and specifically, whether they rallied around the Iranian flag. The research method employed is qualitative media content analysis. The investigation reveals that the Islamic Republic did not benefit from a significant surge in patriotism among Iranian commentators; in fact, some openly applauded the attack. It was only when President Trump threatened to bomb Iranian cultural sites that the commentators rallied around the flag. The Islamic Republic faced a two-front narrative battle as communication attacks from within the national community intensified the information war with the US. The article concludes that authoritarian states are at a disadvantage when they require communication strategies beyond disinformation and distortion.
- Published year: 2023
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad223
- Page count: 20
- Language: English
- Journal: International Affairs
Written by
Kjetil Selvik
Research Professor and Head of the Research group on peace, conflict and development
Banafsheh Ranji
Tidligere ansatt