Researcher
Anni Roth Hjermann
Contactinfo and files
Summary
Anni Roth Hjermann is a Senior Research Fellow at NUPI, working in the Research group for Eastern Europe and Asia. She holds a PhD in Politics and International Studies from the University of Cambridge (UK).
Anni’s research interests revolve around international social hierarchies and socialisation (states navigating norms, status, stigma etc.), the afterlives of socialisation, identity – self/other relations, self/other/third relations (including scapegoating) – and securitisation. Her empirical work is focused on Russia and the former Soviet Union, but she uses Russia as a prism for understanding how non-Western states negotiate relations with the West and the terms of a Western-led global order more generally.
Her PhD monograph (defended June 2025) is entitled Scapegoating International Socialisation: Russia’s (Re-)Encounter Narrative 1999-2018 and argues that Russia has used Ukraine and other ‘Third’ Others as scapegoats for Russia’s self-perceived past failures in navigating the Western-led international social hierarchy after the Cold War.
Additionally, Anni has researched and published on Russia-NATO security and identity relations (in Review of International Studies and Arctic Review on Law and Politics) and on Russian authoritarianism and its internal-external dynamics (in New Perspectives and Internasjonal Politikk). She is also the former co-Editor-in-Chief of the peer-reviewed IR journal Cambridge Review of International Affairs.
Expertise
Education
2021- 2025 PhD, Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge
2018 – 2020 MA, Political Science, University of Oslo
2015 – 2018 BA, Political Science, University of Oslo
2014 – 2018 BA, Russian Area Studies, University of Oslo
Work experience
2025 - Senior Research Fellow, NUPI
2022-2024 Managing Editor and co-Editor-in-Chief, Cambridge Review of International Affairs (CRIA)
2022-2023 Supervisor (small group teaching) for undergraduate students, University of Cambridge.
2019-2021 Graduate Research Fellow and subsequently Advisor, NUPI
2018-2020 Teaching assistant, Research Assistant, and Student ambassador, University of Oslo
2020 Intern, Royal Norwegian Embassy in Moscow
Aktivitet
Filter
Clear all filtersNational network for competence on Russia (RUSSNETT 2026)
The national network for competence on Russia aims to preserve and further develop Norwegian knowledge of Russia across sectors in Norway. ...
National network for competence on Russia (RUSSNETT 2025)
The national network for competence on Russia aims to preserve and further develop Norwegian knowledge of Russia across sectors in Norway. ...
Navigating the Era of Indicators (Navigator)
The European Research Council funded Navigator project (2025-2030) explores how public and private bodies, civil society and the state, navigate the era of indicators in global governa...
Topos of threat and metapolitics in Russia’s securitisation of NATO post-Crimea
This article makes a twofold contribution on the relationship between self/other securitisation, ambiguous threat constructions, and anxiety at the intersection of Securitisation Theory (ST) and Ontological Security Studies (OSS). First, we develop the concept topos of threat (TT) as a potent linguistic anchor in securitisation processes. TTs depict an entire self/other threat situation that warrants escape, serving identity needs while staying flexible and ambiguous. However, their frequent rhetorical deployment can blur the threat construction and increase anxiety: this challenges the classical scholarly assumption that antagonism necessarily alleviates anxiety. Second, we theorise metapolitics as an anxiety mediation strategy. Metapolitics is a mode of interpretation – a relentless analysis of surface clues to expose a deceptive, powerful adversary – which in the final event fails to alleviate anxiety. The dual practice of nurturing topoi of threat and metapolitics drives conflict because it sets in motion a vicious securitisation spiral that entrenches rigid patterns of self/other representation and fosters a bias of anticipating hostility. We employ abductive theorising: working with established theory alongside empirical discovery through a discourse analysis of Russia’s official rhetoric on NATO and the use of the TT ‘colour revolution’ since the conflict in Ukraine began in 2014.
Norway as an in-between for Russia: Ambivalent space, hybrid measures
This three-year project addresses the acutely relevant question of whether Norway is acquiring the precarious status of an ‘in-between’ state in the Kremlin’s eye after the watershed e...
When every act is war: Post-Crimea conflict dynamics and Russian foreign policy (WARU)
Tension between great powers in world politics is escalating rapidly. What are the driving forces behind deteriorating relations? Can we explain them solely by the ‘aggressiveness’ of ...