Hvor mye hjelp kan Norge få i krig?
Russian media downplays Arctic freeze
Is liberal internationalism worth saving? Ad hoc coalitions and their consequences for international security
Slow responses and blocked decision-making of international organizations provide opportunities for ad hoc coalitions to fill functional and political gaps. Compared to UN peace operations, ad hoc coalitions avoid gridlock and high transaction costs, they are fast to set up, can be task and time specific, flexible and easily dissolved. However, they also have much lighter human rights and financial accountability frameworks, a patchy record of longer-term impact and can contribute to a more fragmented response to armed conflicts and threats to international peace and security.
Kristin Haugevik appointed Research Professor
Bendik Manum
Bendik is a master's student at NUPI in the Research group for Russia, Asia, and International Trade, and is currently writing his Master’s thesis...
Rethink territory: How Ukraine can redefine victory
How to ensure European security amid global turmoil?
The emergence of Non-Western and Global International Relations
In this episode of the World Stage podcast, NUPI’s Cedric de Coning is in conversation with Amitav Acharya and Stein Tønnesson on the emergence of...
Russia-West relations before, in and after the war on Ukraine
Was there ever a deal to be had with Putin before the war? Is Russia mainly motivated by domestic or foreign policy considerations? And is there a...
NUPIpodden #19: Den gryende atompopulismen i Asia
Det er i ferd med å skje noe i Øst-Asia. Kinesiske kommentatorer vil ruste opp sine kjernevåpenarsenal. Samtidig øker støtten blant befolkningen i...