Skip to content
NUPI skole
Bildet viser et cog-ship til havs
Foto: Thrago/Creative Commons/CC BY 2.0

Center

Centre for Ocean Governance

Themes

  • Security policy
  • Diplomacy
  • Foreign policy
  • Europe
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • Asia
  • North America
  • South and Central America
  • The Arctic
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • Historical IR

Centre manager:

Elana Wilson Rowe
Research Professor

Events

The politics and governance of the world’s oceans are of pressing importance to Norway, which manages ocean areas six times the size of its land mass.

Oceans are often analysed as sites of environmental politics or economic potential or security dynamics. However, in issues as diverse as maritime power projection in the South China Sea, piracy, public-private partnerships for the blue economy, and preventing plastic pollution, it is the intersection of economics, environment and security that demands further research to elucidate how the world’s oceans are – and could be better – governed.

NUPI’s Centre for Ocean Governance (COG) focuses on these complex and often informal interactions across issue areas and actor groups that shape efforts to govern or dominate ocean space. This focus supplements the Norwegian scholarly community’s existing strengths on issue-specific maritime legal regimes and natural sciences.

Our aim is to deliver high-quality scholarly publications and facilitate policy conversations and public discussion on:

Ocean diplomacy

Our researchers seek to understand why and how diplomacy and expert knowledge shape outcomes in global ocean governance (and why these efforts sometimes fail). This research strand aims to provide advice on how evidence-based policymaking on ocean issues can be further promoted and how the resources and expertise of the non-state actors can contribute to responsible global public goods management.

Geopolitics and security governance at sea

We research how countries’ geopolitical aspirations, and the non-state companies and policy networks with whom these states are associated, shape political relations around the world’s oceans. COG has country-level expertise on the ocean politics of Russia, the U.S., China, Japan, and Brazil, among others.

Comparative and historical research

We engage in systematic, long-lines studies of how the ocean space has become an object for international relations and of the broader networks (state and non-state) that shape policy outcomes for regional seas.

The NUPI research team behind the centre are:


Articles

Articles
Articles

Arctic Governance and Cooperation Through Conflict

Once a symbol of international cooperation and peace, the Arctic now stands at a crossroads between geopolitical tension and diverse opportunities and challenges that require collaboration. How can we move forward on key governance issues in this difficult terrain?
  • The Arctic
  • Governance
arcpress3.png
Articles
Articles

Workshop and scenario exercise in Reykjavik

The ArcPres team convened a workshop and scenario exercise in Reykjavik in October 2023, bringing together experts from Canada, the US, Iceland, and Norway to discuss future trends.
  • The Arctic
Arcpress2.png
Articles
News
Articles
News

Launching Norway’s Plan for the UN’s “Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development”

NUPI’s Centre for Ocean Governance is ready to step up to challenge. 

  • Foreign policy
  • The Arctic
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Oceans
  • Governance
Bildet viser Luciakammen på Svalbard
Articles
News
Articles
News

NUPI awarded funding for five research projects by the Research Council of Norway

The Research Council of Norway awarded NUPI funding for five new research projects.

  • Development policy
  • Diplomacy
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • The Middle East and North Africa
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Oceans
  • International organizations

Doubling Down on Arctic Diplomacy

What impact will the new Biden administration have on Arctic politics? While the Arctic as a region is not likely to figure as feature in the 100-day plan of a new Biden presidency,  there are reasons to expect some key changes for the region.

  • Security policy
  • Diplomacy
  • Foreign policy
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • The Arctic
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Governance
Bildet viser en isbjørn som svømmer i havet
News
News

Prestigious ERC funding to Elana Wilson Rowe – ‘I’m thrilled!’

The European Research Council (ERC) yearly awards talented early career researchers project funding through Starting grants. 403 research projects were granted this year, and Elana Wilson Rowe's (NUPI) is one of them.

  • Climate

Security realities of freezing politics and thawing landscapes in the Arctic

How to address Arctic security and governance issues in a region marked by climate change and geopolitical challenges?
  • Defence and security
  • Security policy
  • Europe
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • The Arctic
  • Conflict
  • Oceans
  • Governance

New publications

Publications
Publications
Scientific article

Norge er en stormakt innen havforskning - FNs tiår for havforskning må gi et ytterligere løft

Op-ed on Norway's role in the UN Ocean Decade.

  • Diplomacy and foreign policy
  • Foreign policy
  • Regions
  • The Arctic
  • Natural resources and climate
  • Oceans
  • Global governance
  • United Nations
Norge-er-en-stormakt-innen-havforskning_large.png
  • Diplomacy and foreign policy
  • Foreign policy
  • Regions
  • The Arctic
  • Natural resources and climate
  • Oceans
  • Global governance
  • United Nations
Publications
Publications
Report

The challenge of IUU fishing in West Africa and The PotentialTechnology Solutions: An analysis of international cooperationprojects in Ghana and Gu...

Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing is a social, economic and environmental problem. It undermines management and drives the depletion of fish stocks, threatens food security, and drains valuable resources from the economy. In recent decades, efforts have been made to build an international regime that can curb IUU fishing. However, implementing this regime and stemming the tides of IUU fishing remains challenging. At the center of this challenge is the necessity to create capacity in states for the monitoring, control, and surveillance (MCS) of fisheries. Monitoring fisheries means measuring fishing effort characteristics and resource yields continuously. The control of fisheries concerns the establishment of regulations for exploiting resources. Surveillance refers to the measures to secure compliance with regulatory controls.

  • International investments
  • Africa
Screenshot 2022-10-04 at 12.32.05.png
  • International investments
  • Africa
Publications
Publications
Chapter

A Governance and Risk Inventory for a Changing Arctic

In this chapter, Elana Wilson Rowe, Ulf Sverdrup, Karsten Friis, Geir Hønneland, and Mike Sfraga caution against viewing trends of conflict and cooperation in the Arctic in binary terms. While the US and Europe are determined to confront malign activity in the region, all sides continue to “demonstrate a commitment to cooperation and joint solutions to common challenges.” After reviewing the key factors and drivers supporting and challenging stability in the Arctic, the authors remind us that “cooperation in conflict” has long been the norm in the region, allowing cooperative governance to progress despite the enduring NATO-Russia military rivalry. Ongoing dialogue in the region – essential for addressing the regional and global implications of climate change – is poorly served by focussing on “narratives or practices of strategic competition alone.” To avoid “political tipping points” beyond which cooperation will become too difficult, the authors call on policymakers to be more proactive in how they address emerging governance challenges related to security and economic development.

  • Security policy
  • Diplomacy
  • The Arctic
  • Oceans
  • Security policy
  • Diplomacy
  • The Arctic
  • Oceans
Publications
Publications
Report
Hans Jørgen Gåsemyr, Gørild Heggelund

China in the Sustainable Development Agenda: Key environmental issues and responses

China is dealing with very serious pollution levels and the unsustainable use of many natural resources. Environmental issues, concerning both air, ground, and ocean, have gained increasing recognition in Chinese domestic politics, and China is stepping into more active roles in international environmental governance. By committing to international agreements but insisting on differentiated responsibilities and voluntary contributions, China is taking something of a middle position between developing countries and many higher-income states.

  • Development policy
  • Diplomacy
  • Foreign policy
  • Asia
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Oceans
  • International organizations
  • United Nations
  • Development policy
  • Diplomacy
  • Foreign policy
  • Asia
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Oceans
  • International organizations
  • United Nations
Publications
Publications
Report

A Governance and Risk Inventory for a Changing Arctic

Many government officials, military leaders, and political observers have proclaimed the rise of a new, post-Cold War global great power competition between the United States, Russia, and China with myriad implications. Using this new reality as the backdrop for the Arctic Security Roundtable at the Munich Security Conference 2020, roundtable participants are asked to explore, discuss, and debate this issue in the context of, and implications for the new globalized Arctic. This paper – a primer of Arctic trends, risks, and institutions – provides a useful starting point for the discussion. Discussing Arctic security in high-level forums is important. One might ask why we should take the time to discuss the Arctic if we are not fighting a war there. The answer is this: there is a new ocean opening up due to global climate change. There is a promising track record of governance cooperation in the region that serves as a basis for pursuing sustainable management of and peace in this new ocean. The point of dialogue – with an emphasis on cooperation, joint governance and outlining risks and potential tipping points – is to make sure that we do not add the Arctic to the already far-too-long list of global hot spots. The Arctic Security Roundtable at the Munich Security Conference 2020 provides one such confidential forum for proactive and constructive debate on Arctic security issues.

  • Security policy
  • The Arctic
  • Governance
  • Security policy
  • The Arctic
  • Governance
Publications
Publications
Report

Mind the Gap: National Views of the Free and Open Indo-Pacific

Japan has played an intrinsic role in formulating and promoting the concept of a “Free and Open Indo-Pacific” (FOIP) by making its version a core element of its foreign policy repertoire as it continues to strengthen and expand its presence beyond its immediate neighborhood. This chapter discusses the diplomatic, political, economic and security dimensions of Japan’s FOIP, expanding on both the strengths and challenges of the concept and its implementation.

  • Security policy
  • Economic growth
  • Trade
  • Regional integration
  • Diplomacy
  • Foreign policy
  • Asia
  • North America
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Security policy
  • Economic growth
  • Trade
  • Regional integration
  • Diplomacy
  • Foreign policy
  • Asia
  • North America
  • Climate
  • Oceans
Publications
Publications
Report

Improving Future Ocean Governance – Governance of Global Goods in an Age of Global Shifts

Japan’s G20 presidency in 2019 will take the lead in promoting environmentally sustainable economic growth and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). As a gathering of coastal states, under Japan’s presidency the G20 will specifically work to reduce marine plastic pollution and support marine biodiversity. This policy paper highlights how oceans are governed spaces and points to the key role of the oceans in realizing the SDGs. We argue that the G20 can and should play an important role in addressing major governance gaps in ensuring the sustainable management of oceans. Recognizing that there are increased geopolitical tensions, and that we do indeed already have comprehensive multi-level governance systems in place to handle many aspects of the growing ‘blue economy’ and avoiding the tragedy of the commons, the G20 should primarily stress the need for full and effective implementation of existing instruments and measures at the national, regional and global levels and increased consistency across levels of governance. This would effectively address many of the challenges and make use of the opportunities of the oceans. However, the rapidly moving horizon of technological development and insufficient progress in mitigating global climate change represent new governance challenges that require renewed effort and innovative thinking for a sustainable future for the oceans. This policy paper provides recommendations as to how G20 states can: consolidate their own capacity and assist non-G20 states in taking responsibility for strengthening marine science and implementation of existing regulatory frameworks, exercise innovative global and regional leadership to address emerging opportunities and associated governance challenges and facilitate the meaningful involvement of the private sector and the public in ensuring a collective governance order around oceans.

  • Asia
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • International organizations
  • Asia
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • International organizations
Publications
Publications
Report

The Arctic Council and US domestic policymaking

One widely recognized achievement of the Arctic Council and its various working groups has been the production of collectively generated assessments on Arctic problems. Assessment reports such as the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA) provide an important baseline of shared knowledge for making collective circumpolar policy recommendations. But how does the knowledge produced through Arctic Council working groups figure into the policymaking of the Arctic states? This is an important question for understanding Arctic politics and the relationship between national decisionmaking and international relations more generally. Much of what the Arctic Council produces is in the form of recommendations, declarations of intent, and commitments to "best practices" in areas of shared interest and activity. While in recent years the Council has produced three binding agreements covering specific functional areas—search and rescue (2011), oil pollution preparedness and response (2013),and science cooperation (2017)—much ongoing Arctic collaborative work falls outside of these areas. This policy brief explores how science/policy outputs of and discussions at the Arctic Council fit into the Arctic political discourse of the USA, with an emphasis on key actors within the executive branch: the White House, the Department of the Interior, and the Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Diplomacy
  • Foreign policy
  • Europe
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • Asia
  • North America
  • The Arctic
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • International organizations
  • Diplomacy
  • Foreign policy
  • Europe
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • Asia
  • North America
  • The Arctic
  • Climate
  • Energy
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • International organizations
Publications
Publications
Book

Arctic Governance: Power in cross-border cooperation

This book seeks to pose and explore a question that sheds light on the contested but largelyl cooperative nature of Arctic governance in the post Cold-War period: how does power matter - and how has it mattered - in shaping cross-border cooperation and diplomacy in the Arctic? Each chapter functions as a window through which power relations in the Arctic are explored. Issues include how representing the Arctic region matters for securing preffered outcomes, how circumpolar cooperation is marked by regional hierarchies and how Arctic governance has become a global social site in its own right, replete with disciplining norms for steering diplomatic behaviour. This book draws upon Russia's role in the Arctic Council as an extended case study and examines how Arctic cross-border governance can be understood as a site of competition over the exercise of authority. The book was launched at the Stimson Center in Washington DC on 12 September 2018. Watch the launch seminar, Russia and Arctic Governance: Cooperation in Conflict, here: https://youtu.be/bQ0iKwUbims

  • Diplomacy
  • Foreign policy
  • Europe
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • Asia
  • North America
  • The Arctic
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • International organizations
  • Diplomacy
  • Foreign policy
  • Europe
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • Asia
  • North America
  • The Arctic
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • International organizations
Publications
Publications
Chapter

Private force and the emergence of the international system

This chapter deals with the importance of private force to the early emergence and spread of the international system. It discusses how varieties of non-traditional forms of force helped maintain what was in many ways an international system of empires. The chapter focuses on the rules, norms and values of the system and shows how the gradual abolishment of private force has helped foster ideational cohesion in the international system. It also focuses on modes of interaction, and on how an unintended consequence of the use of private force has been a functionalist push for a tighter integrated system. The chapter also deals with mercenarism, privateering and piracy, the most important forms of private force for the emergence of the international system. It concludes that private force should be understood as one of the central productive forces in the gradual emergence of the modern international system.

  • Security policy
  • Oceans
  • Historical IR
  • Security policy
  • Oceans
  • Historical IR
Publications
Publications
Scientific article

Kaperne kommer!

(Available in Norwegian only): I en kommentar i Aftenposten i februar sammenlignet Inger Anne Olsen dagens sjørøveri utenfor Somalia med kapervirksomhet utenfor norskekysten under Napoleonskrigene, en praksis hun refererte til som «piratvirksomhet med statlig velsignelse». Sammenligningen er uheldig på mange nivåer, men ikke minst fordi den visker ut skillet mellom kaper og sjørøver, et skille som kunne bety liv eller død både for de mennene som bar karakteristikkene og for de som var om bord i skipene de bemektiget seg. Sammenblandingen er imidlertid forståelig; der de fleste har et relativt klart bilde av hva en sjørøver er eller var, tror mange fortsatt at man snakker om «kaprere» når man forsøker å diskutere kapere. Og selv forfatteren av boken om norske sjørøvere, som gjør et poeng av å skille mellom sjørøvere og kapere, faller for fristelsen til å omtale de norske kaperne under Napoleonskrigene som sjørøvere (Hetland 2008). Den første målsettingen med denne artikkelen er derfor å klargjøre hva en kaper var, og hvordan de skilte seg fra sjørøvere. I et norsk perspektiv er det påfallende hvor lite kunnskap som finnes om kapere. I kystbyer på Sør-Vestlandet finnes en levende bevissthet om kapervirksomheten under Napoleonskrigene, med kaperdager og lokale spel. I den nasjonale bevisstheten er det allikevel kaptein Sabeltann og sjørøvere som assosieres med Sørlandets private voldsmakt. Historisk sett har Norge som kystnasjon imidlertid vel så mye erfaring med kapere som med sjørøvere, og den andre målsettingen med denne artikkelen er å skissere kort hvilke erfaringer vi har med kapere i Norge og å antyde noen grunner til at kaperne har blitt glemt.

  • Oceans
  • Historical IR
  • Oceans
  • Historical IR
Publications
Publications
Report
Karsten Friis, Elana Wilson Rowe, Ulf Sverdrup, Mike Sfraga, Pavel K. Baev, Troy J. Bouffard, Marc Lanteigne, Marisol Maddox, Jan-Gunnar Winther

Navigating Breakup: Security realities of freezing politics and thawing landscapes in the Arctic

Russia’s re-invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has had immediate and ongoing effects for Arctic security and cooperative governance at both a regional and international level. The region is impacted by the increased sanctions, the withdrawal of Western companies from Russia, the Western disconnect from energy dependencies, and has also witnessed an increase in hybrid security incidents.  In addition, climate change continues at to change the environment at a staggering pace in the north. This report is an input to the Arctic Security Roundtable (ASR) and the Munich Security Conference, February 2023. It provides insights into both established and novel drivers of change in Arctic and security governance. Chapters cover the impacts of climate change on the physical environment, human security and the Arctic region’s military operational environment, and review the regional security policies of the three major powers (USA, China and Russia). The report argues leaders must continue to address Arctic governance challenges and take concrete steps to mitigate and manage risks, regardless of the cessation of cooperation with Russia and the radical uncertainty shaping the broader political environment.

  • Security policy
  • The Arctic
  • Climate
Screenshot 2023-02-16 at 17.15.47.png
  • Security policy
  • The Arctic
  • Climate
Publications
Publications
Scientific article

Space, nature and hierarchy: the ecosystemic politics of the Caspian Sea

The Anthropocene has given rise to growing efforts to govern the world’s ecosystems. There is a hitch, however, ecosystems do not respect sovereign borders; hundreds traverse more three states and thus require complex international cooperation. This article critically examines the political and social consequences of the growing but understudied trend towards transboundary ecosystem cooperation. Matchmaking the new hierarchy scholarship in International Relations (IR) and political geography, the article theorises how ecosystem discourse embodies a latent spatially exclusive logic that can bind together and bound from outside unusual bedfellows in otherwise politically awkward spaces. The authors contend that such ‘ecosystemic politics’ can generate spatialised ‘broad hierarchies’ that cut across both Westphalian renderings of space and the latent post-colonial and/or material inequalities that have hitherto been the focus of most of the new hierarchies scholarship. Rowe and Beaumont illustrate their argument by conducting a multilevel longitudinal analysis of how Caspian Sea environmental cooperation has produced a broad hierarchy demarking and sharpening the boundaries of the region, become symbolic of Caspian in-group competence and neighbourliness, and used as a rationale for future Caspian-shaped cooperation. They reason that if ecosystemic politics can generate new renderings of space amid an otherwise heavily contested space as the Caspian, further research is warranted to explore systemic hierarchical consequences elsewhere.

  • Russia and Eurasia
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Governance
European Journal of International Relations - cover.jpeg
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Governance
Publications
Publications
Scientific article

Ecosystems and Ordering: Exploring the Extent and Diversity of Ecosystem Governance

This article argues that, to grasp how global ordering will be impacted by planetary-level changes, we need to systematically attend to the question of the extent to which and how ecosystems are being governed. Our inquiry builds upon—but extends beyond—the environmental governance measures that have garnered the most scholarly attention so far. The dataset departs from the current literature on regional environmental governance by taking ecosystems themselves as the unit of analysis and then exploring whether and how they are governed, rather than taking a starting point in environmental institutions and treaties. The ecosystems researched—large-scale marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems—have been previously identified by a globe-spanning, natural science inquiry. Our findings highlight the uneven extent of ecosystem governance—both the general geographic extent and certain “types” of ecosystems seemingly lending themselves more easily to ecosystem-based cooperation. Furthermore, our data highlight that there is a wider range of governance practices anchored in ecosystems than the typical focus on environmental institutions reveals. Of particular significance is the tendency by political actors to establish multi-issue governance anchored in the ecosystems themselves and covering several different policy fields. We argue that, in light of scholarship on ecosystem-anchored cooperation and given the substantive set of cases of such cooperation identified in the dataset, these forms of ecosystem-anchored cooperation may have particularly significant ordering effects. They merit attention in the international relations scholarship that seeks to account for the diversity of global ordering practices.

  • Regional integration
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • International organizations
GQS thumbnail (002).jpeg
  • Regional integration
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • International organizations

Projects

Research project
2017 - 2022 (Completed)

Empires, Privateering and the sea (EMPRISE)

EMPRISE studies the role of the importance of power at sea for the formation of empires and states from 1500-1856....

  • Security policy
  • Trade
  • Diplomacy
  • Europe
  • North America
  • South and Central America
  • Conflict
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • Historical IR
  • Security policy
  • Trade
  • Diplomacy
  • Europe
  • North America
  • South and Central America
  • Conflict
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • Historical IR
Bildet viser Luciakammen på Svalbard
Research Project
2018 - 2023 (Completed)

The Lorax Project: Understanding Ecosystemic Politics (LORAX)

Do regional politics around border-crossing ecosystems share important resemblances and differ in significant ways from global politics?...

  • Diplomacy
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • South and Central America
  • The Arctic
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • International organizations
  • Diplomacy
  • Russia and Eurasia
  • South and Central America
  • The Arctic
  • Climate
  • Oceans
  • Governance
  • International organizations
Bildet viser KNM Steil under Arctic Hawk 2019
Research Project
2018 - 2019 (Completed)

Revitalizing Transatlantic Maritime Security

This project will generate concrete policy proposals, particularly in the maritime domain, and look at ways for the United States and Europe, and Norway in particular, to adapt their military division...

  • Defence
  • Security policy
  • NATO
  • Europe
  • North America
  • Oceans
  • The EU
  • Defence
  • Security policy
  • NATO
  • Europe
  • North America
  • Oceans
  • The EU