The GeGaLo index: Geopolitical gains and losses after energy transition
This article presents the GeGaLo index of geopolitical gains and losses that 156 countries may experience after a full-scale transition to renewable energy. The following indicators are considered for inclusion in the index: fossil fuel production, fossil fuel reserves, renewable energy resources, governance, and conflict. Some of these represent potential gains; some represent losses; and some the capacity of countries to handle changes in geopolitical strength. Five alternative versions of the index are developed to work out the optimal design. First, the energy resource indicators are combined with equal weights to create two simple versions of the index. Next, governance and conflict indicators are included to create three more complex versions of the index. The index provides useful pointers for strategic energy and foreign policy choices: geopolitical power will be more evenly distributed after an energy transition; Iceland will gain most; Russia may be one of the main holders of stranded geopolitical assets; China and the USA will lose more geopolitically than foreseen by other analyses. The index also indicates a lack of emphasis in parts of the literature on space for renewable energy infrastructure and on domestically sourced coal for the current strength of countries such as China and the United States.
Amerikansk cyberstrategi og offensive operasjonar
Korleis ønskjer det amerikanske cyberforsvaret å posisjonere seg i cyberspace?
David Petraeus gjestet NUPI
NUPI hadde gleden av å ha besøk av David H. Petraeus 30. september.
A Century of US Diplomatic Security: An Evolutionary Response to a Changing Threat Environment
This chapter traces nearly 100 years of US Diplomatic Security from its pre-WWI origins up to the Obama Administration, describing the key drivers of its qualitative and quantitative expansion through the Cold War into the post 9-11 world. It offers a detailed breakdown of the various roles and missions of the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security, as well as the ancillary diplomatic security role played by the US military.
PODKAST: Hvorfor populisme? Hvorfor her? Hvorfor nå?
Lever vi i en populistisk tid, eller er «populisme» bare et moteord i mediene?
Amerikansk cyberstrategi og 5G-nettet
Kva er dei viktigaste utfordringane og prioriteringane i amerikansk cybertryggleik?
Kvifor populisme?
Kven er dei nye populistane? Og er dei eigentleg populistiske?
Ikke bare en handelskrig
Det er liten grunn til å tro på en snarlig løsning i konflikten mellom Kina og USA, skriver Ulf Sverdrup i denne DN-kronikken.